Forums Forums Traffic Signs TSRGD 2016 Illumination Requirements For One-Way Signs Reply To: Illumination Requirements For One-Way Signs

#4102

SimonMorgan
November 2016

Well spotted, Warren.
This could be an oversight, but if so it is an old one as the 2002 TSRGD had the same distinction (or the 2011 No 2 amendment in the case of diag. 960.2). The 2016 TSRGD has simply replicated the previous requirement.

I’m guessing it was deliberate, as the signs indicating contra-flow cycling are larger, with greater ‘target value’ and therefore less likely to be missed.

Any other views or thoughts on this?